Research the recent Wells Fargo Bank fraud. The reference provided from CNNMoney in the unit resources will get you started.
Directions:
- Analyze this particular situation from perspective of Bolman & Deal.
- Utilizing the strucrural frame, develop at least two interview questions for the Wells Fargo bankers that would have emanated from your unique perspective. (Bolman & Deal).
- These questions should:
- Be clear and respectful.
- Address significant issues at the heart of the bank fraud.
- Connect to a specific tenet of your unique perspective and specify which tenet that is.
- Elicit a response of more than a yes or no answer.
Refer to the next page for the grading rubric.
Students: Be sure to read the criteria, by which your paper/project will be evaluated, before you write, and again after you write.
Evaluation Rubric for Fraud Triangle Assignment
CRITERIA | NEEDS IMPROVEMENT | PROFICIENT | EXEMPLARY |
0 – 10 points | 11 – 13 points | 14 – 15 points | |
Question Quantity | Less than 2 questions | 2 questions | More than 2 questions |
0 – 27 points | 28 – 31 points | 32 – 35 points | |
Question Quality | Inadequate demonstration of unique perspective and/or questions are poorly written and/or questions written in a manner that elicits no more than yes or no answer | Demonstrated connection to unique perspective and/or clearly written and/or response requires more than yes/no answer | Demonstrated unique perspective with creative use of language and/or questions were well written and challenged respondents’ thinking, and/or questions prompted complex responses |