| Criteria | Ratings | Points | |||
| Historical Financial Statements | 35 to >31.0 pts Advanced | 31 to >27.0 pts Proficient | 27 to >0.0 pts Developing | 0 pts Not Present | 35 pts |
| Includes all 3 of the company financial statements for the 3 most current years.Income StatementBalance SheetStatement of Cash Flows • Analysis includes horizontal and vertical changes for each line item for the 3 most current years. | Includes 2 of the company financial statements for the 3 most current years. • Inco Statement • Balance Sheet • Statement of Cash Flows • Analysis includes half of the horizontal and vertical changes for each line item for the 3 most current years. | Includes less than 2 of t company financial statements for the 3 most current years. • Income Statement • Balance SheStatement of Cash FlowAnalysis includes one th of the horizontal and vertical changes for each line item for the 3 most current years. | |||
| Ratios | 21 to >18.0 pts | 18 to >15.0 pts | 15 to >0.0 pts | 0 pts | 21 pts |
| Advanced | Proficient | Developing | Not Present | ||
| Profitability, Liquidi Leverage, Activity, and Price-to-Earnings ratios are present and correctly calculated.Competitor ratios a present and correctly calculated. • Chang between years are included. | Profitability, Liquidit Leverage, Activity, and Price-to-Earnings ratios are present and more than half are correctly calculated. • More tha half of the competitor ratios are mostly present and correctly calculated.More than half of the changes between years are included. | Profitability, Liquidity, Leverage, Activity, and Price-to-Earnings ratios are present and less than half are correctly calculated.Less than half of the competitor ratios are present and correctly calculated.Less than half of the changes between years are included. |
| Criteria | Ratings | Points | |||
| Financial Analysis Narrative | 35 to >31.0 pts Advanced | 31 to >27.0 pts Proficient | 27 to >0.0 pts Developing | 0 pts Not Present | 35 pts |
| Financial analysis included clear comparisons to the identified competitor and to the industry.The financial positi of the firm and its impact on strategic choice was clearly identified and discussed. • Analysis the firms financial position was clear and areas of weakness or strength were identified. The analysis was substantially supported by research. | Financial analysis included mostly clear comparisons to the identified competitor and to the industry. • The financial position of the firm and its impact on strategic choice was identified and discussed.Analysis of the firms financial position was mostly included and some areas of weakness or strength were mostly identified. • The analysis was mostly supported by research. | Financial analysis inclu some clear comparisons to the identified competitor and/or to the industry. • T financial position of the firm and its impact on strategic choice was mostly identified and some discussion was included. • Analysis of the firms financial position was briefly described but areas of weakness or strength were not clearly identified. • T analysis included some research but should be more fully supported. | |||
| Grammar, Spelling & Format | 39 to >32.0 pts Advanced | 32 to >24.0 pts Proficient | 24 to >0.0 pts Developing | 0 pts Not Present | 39 pts |
| Proper spelling and grammar are used. APA format including a cover page, citations and references are correct. Less than 4 errors were present. | Between 4 – 8 spelling, grammar, format or citation errors are present. | Between 8–10 spelling, grammar, format or citation errors are present. | More than 10 spelling, grammar, format, or citation errors are present. | ||
| Total Points: 130 |
Need help with this assignment or a similar one? Place your order and leave the rest to our experts!