Comparing Hobbes and Locke on the State of Nature

Question description

Analyze the concept of the state of nature by first reviewing the material on Thomas Hobbes and John Locke. Consider their discussion of life in the state of nature. Do you find their arguments convincing? Construct your answer into the following 2 parts:

Part 1: In a paragraph of at least 150 words, discuss whether Hobbes or Locke gave a more convincing picture of life without government in the state of nature. Your thread must demonstrate that you understand the meaning of this concept. Explain why you find 1 author more persuasive than the other. Cite specific points. The main point is not which author you choose but instead how well you support your position. Your thread must leave no doubt that you read both authors carefully. You must incorporate 3 citations in current Turabian format. Acceptable sources include the textbooks and the Bible. Be sure to cite specific page references from your assigned textbook readings.

Part 2: In a paragraph of at least 150 words, explore the biblical basis for the state of nature argument. Is the general concept of the state of nature (not the specific versions of Hobbes or Locke)compatible with Christianity? Why or why not? Cite specific points. The main consideration is how well you support your argument with logic as well as specific references to the authors and to Scripture. Be sure to cite specific page references from your assigned textbook readings.

Your thread must be at least 300 words and incorporate 3 citations in current Turabian format. Acceptable sources include the textbooks and the Bible.